Only the first section, which is chapters
1-39, could possibly have been written by the prophet Isaiah. The remaining chapters describe events that
happened after Isaiah’s time, and therefore were clearly written by someone
else, someone who hoped to carry Isaiah’s themes into a new day.
Chapters 1 – 39 talk
about Israel’s journey into exile.
The later chapters
talk about life after exile. Starting in
chapter 56, the focus is on the restored community; life after exile, back in
the homeland, and how members of that community are to live in relation to one
another as well as in relation to others in their midst.
And then the author
talks about foreigners and eunuchs who want to be a part of this newly
re-formed community.
This isn’t the first
time scripture has something to say about foreigners and eunuchs.
Deuteronomy 23
mentions foreigners and eunuchs.
Specifically, it says that neither is allowed to be a part of God’s
community. Neither is welcome in the
temple. Regarding foreigners,
Deuteronomy specifically says: “You shall
never promote their welfare or their prosperity as long as you live.”
In other words, “build
high the walls and fences and keep them
out.”
No foreigners. No aliens.
No immigrants.
Then we have today’s
passage, from Isaiah 56. The author
clearly knew what it said in Deuteronomy.
Deuteronomy 23 was in the forefront of his mind as he wrote.
Yet he boldly
contradicted Deuteronomy 23 when he wrote:
“Do not let the foreigner joined to the Lord say, ‘The Lord will exclude
me from his people…’ This is what the Lord says: ‘To the immigrants, the
foreigners, who have joined me: I will
bring them in to my house of prayer. I
will accept them and welcome them, for my house will be known as a house of
prayer for all people. After all, I am
the God who gathers not only Israel’s outcasts, but also others as well.’”
And depending on what
your view is on the current immigration debate, you could pick either
Deuteronomy or Isaiah – whichever one matches your own view – and use it to
defend your position.
This is why it’s not
helpful to just throw verses around. You
can find a verse, take it out of context, and use it to justify just about
anything.
I once attended a high
school play, and since it was at a Christian high school, the organizers felt
the need to include a Bible verse at the top of the program. I think the verse might have been Hebrews
13.18: “Act honorably in all things.” It
made me laugh. The verse has absolutely
nothing to do with putting on a play.
Yet there it was.
You can find a verse
to justify anything if you look hard enough and are willing to ignore the
context. And even when you pay attention
to the context, you can probably still find a verse to justify your position, because
scripture does often come down on both sides of an issue… just like it does
with foreigners and immigrants.
But there is an even
bigger picture.
One question I ask in
situations like this is, “What core value
of faith and scripture applies here?” A
core value is a message, an emphasis, that – thought it may be contradicted –
appears often enough in scripture that any contradictions appear to be
anomalies.
Clearly, the most
important core value of scripture is love of God and love of neighbor.
This short passage is
quoted often throughout scripture, even in the New Testament. It even has a name: the Shema. It is recited regularly in Jewish
congregations to this day. Ask any Jew
what the Shema is, and they’ll recite the verse. “Shema
Ysrael; Hear, O Israel: You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart,
and with all your soul, and with all your might.”
I have no doubt that
growing up, Jesus learned to recite this verse often. It was probably one of the first that he
learned. And later, when Jesus was asked
what the most important command was, he replied by quoting it.
But after he recited
the Shema, saying that “you should love the Lord your God with all your heart,
with all your soul, and with all your might,” Jesus then added, “…and you
should love your neighbor as yourself.”
For Jesus, the two could not be separated. Love of God, and love of neighbor.
And just who is one’s neighbor? Jesus answered that question as well, with a
story about … wait for it … a
foreigner.
The Samaritans lived
in the wrong place, they worshipped at the wrong place, and there was great
animosity between them and the Jews who centered their life in Jerusalem. And
yet even the Samaritan, Jesus said, is one’s neighbor, one whom you should
love.
Then there is the time
Philip, one of Jesus’s disciples, met a man from Ethiopia – a foreigner – who
also just happened to be a eunuch. And
after some conversation, this man asked Philip, “What is there to prevent me
from being baptized?”
I suspect that, in the
back of Philip’s mind, he was thinking, “Well, there’s Deuteronomy 23 for one
thing! … But then, there is also Isaiah 56, which contradicts Deuteronomy 23…
Which is right?”
And perhaps he thought
of Lot, who also welcomed two strangers from another land into his home, offering them protection,
shelter, and food… and how Lot ended up with a whole heap of trouble right at
his doorstep because of it.
And yet, scripture
lifted both of them up as heroes, men of great faith.
So maybe welcoming
strangers and foreigners and immigrants is the right thing to do, even if it’s
not always easy.
And then of course
there were the words and actions of Jesus which I already mentioned, which
Philip was familiar with.
And there are other
passages as well; passages like Leviticus 19:34, which says “Any immigrant who
lives with you must be treated as if they were one of your citizens. You must love them as yourself, because you
yourselves were immigrants in the land of Egypt.”
And then there is the
whole movement of the New Testament following Jesus’s crucifixion and
resurrection. It’s a constantly
expanding movement, an outward movement.
Are we ready to apply
scripture’s message to our current situation?
Well, not quite yet. We must take
into consideration that our time is not the same as the ancient times. Every situation is unique.
We cannot just dismiss
those questions. They are important
questions. Important in terms of the
welfare of our nation and its people.
Important in terms of the prosperity we hope to achieve and maintain.
There are other
stories in scripture that may help us out here.
The way this is
presented in the gospel, it deliberately contrasts the feeding of the 5,000
with Herod’s banquet which is where John the Baptist died.
Herod worried about
running out. Herod had it all! All the wealth, all the power, and yet his
banquet party ended in death and sadness.
On the other hand,
those thousands of people with Jesus had wandered out to the wilderness – a
desolate place, a desert, a place seemingly devoid of life and sustenance, a
place where resources were definitely in short supply. And yet with Jesus, the focus is not on
running out. With Jesus, the focus is on
abundance. With Jesus, there is always
enough.
When we look at the
issue of immigration, I think the way we
approach the issue, and the opinions we hold, depend on which banquet table we
sit at.
If we sit at Herod’s
banquet table, where we are in constant fear of running out even though wealth
is all around us, our questions and answers are going to be very different than
if we are sitting in the wilderness at Jesus’s banquet.
Is there enough to go
around?
Herod’s banquet was a
private event. Doors were guarded, I’m
sure, to only let certain people in.
After all, Herod had his wealth, his prosperity… and he wanted to keep
it.
There were no doors at
Jesus’s banquet. At first glance, there
wasn’t enough food, either. Just five
loaves and two fish, for thousands of people.
It was the disciples who pointed out the obvious: “We can’t feed this many people with what we’ve got! Send them away!”
Isn’t that the same
argument used against immigration today?
If you welcome “them,” they’ll take our resources, our wealth, our jobs…
so, send them away.
So the question we
have to ask when it comes to the immigrants and refugees seeking new life in
America: Will we tell them that we don’t
have enough? Will we send them
away? Will we close the doors and post
guards, so that they don’t come in and take away from our wealth and
prosperity?
Or will we welcome
them in Jesus’s name, trusting that our limited supply of loaves and fish will
be enough for us all to be blessed?
I know that politically
or economically, the answers to these questions might be different than
what I suggest. Politically or economically,
my answers might even be foolish.
But I am not a
politician. I am not an economist. I am, first and foremost, a follower of
Jesus. And it’s his wisdom that I seek
when I wrestle with difficult questions.
No comments:
Post a Comment