Showing posts with label acts 10. Show all posts
Showing posts with label acts 10. Show all posts

Sunday, June 15, 2025

What Was God Thinking? (Acts 10:1-36)

 Two weeks until I go to camp. This might be the last scripture we give any real attention to at camp, because if we take the scriptures in order, it will come on the last full day of camp. 

There is one more scripture, which we’ll hear next week, for the very last day of camp, the day campers go home. But this is our story for today, and it’s a long one. Thanks for sticking with me.


Now, I had originally prepared a nice long opening to this sermon, setting the scene and all that, mostly to show off my homiletical skills.

But the other day, something happened that I feel God is calling me to address.

A colleague of mine, a Disciples of Christ pastor in southern California named Tanya Lopez, who I had worked with on several occasions when I was in California, and whose church in Downey, California, is not far from the church I was pastor of in Long Beach…

The other day, five men in masks and carrying guns came on to her church’s property, uninvited, unannounced, with no warrant. They arrived in an unmarked van with tinted windows. They were in the parking lot, and started harassing a local man walking through the parking lot. They didn’t ask him who he was. They didn’t ask to see any form of ID. They just grabbed him and were attempting to take him away.

This man was not a member of the congregation, but like us here at First Christian Church, the Disciples church in Downey tries to be a good neighbor to those in the community. It’s like how we have developed a sort of protective attitude toward those who visit our helping shelf.

So Tanya went out to the parking lot, introduced herself as the pastor, and asked these masked gunmen who they were, and what they were doing.

It took a lot of guts for her to do that, I’m sure. I’m nervous just telling you this story. I don’t know how you’ll receive what God has placed on my heart to say today. But Tanya’s bravery in that moment inspires me to tell this story, even though my voice is shaking a bit.

When she asked the gunmen who they were and why they were there, they refused to answer her. They refused to show her a warrant, or present their IDs, although it seemed apparent that they were ICE agents sent by the government. 

Tanya told them that they were on private property and that they were not welcome there, but they ignored her.

She then started asking the man they were taking away what his name was, what was his date of birth. Once he was taken away, she wanted to be able to find his family and let them know what happened to him—otherwise his family would never know.

That’s when the agents pointed their guns at her—my friend, the pastor. She was not physically interfering. She was not in any way using violence. She was asking questions, and she was demanding that these men respect her rights and the rights of the man they were taking away. She was demanding justice, just like the daughters of Zelophehad, who we heard about last week, demanded justice.

While this was happening, Tanya’s young daughters, on summer break from school, happened to be there; and they watched all this, horrified. They thought they were about to watch these masked gunmen shoot their mother. They are now traumatized by the event.

What’s particularly troubling about this is that the masked gunmen wouldn’t say who they were or why they were taking this man away. There was no due process, and this man’s family would never know what had happened to him, had Tanya not intervened. (I don’t know if she was actually able to get his name and contact info, or if she was able to contact his family, so they may still not know.) If Tanya hadn’t been there, he would have just disappeared.

Now, I know we don’t all agree on the status of undocumented immigrants in this country. I don’t want to get into the politics of it all. But I hope we can agree that every person should be treated decently, no matter what, and that any action taken against people should be done with transparency, according to the law, and respecting both human rights and constitutional rights.

Even if you think it's right to capture and deport someone who is undocumented, there is a right and a wrong way to do it.

Having masked gunmen come uninvited onto church property, and even threatening the pastor of the church, without identifying themselves or saying why they are taking individuals away by force, is immoral. 

One entry in the Diary of Anne Frank reads: “people are being dragged out of their homes…Families are torn apart; men, women and children are separated. Children come home from school to find that their parents have disappeared. Women return from shopping to find their houses sealed, their families gone.”

It’s scary how similar that sounds to what is happening today.

And I’m trying to figure out how God is calling me to respond. I’m praying. And I’m listening for God to guide me.

Some of that guidance, I believe, has come to me as I’ve studied the story of Peter and Cornelius.

See, Peter, like all Jews of his time, believed in the separation of clean and unclean, pure and impure. Certain animals, certain foods, certain occupations, and even certain biological occurrences were considered unclean. 

If one could avoid what was unclean or impure, one should try to avoid it.

If it couldn’t be avoided, then one needed to go through a ritual cleansing in order to restore one’s cleanliness and purity.

As a faithful Jew, Peter lived by these rules. He believed that they were rules given to the Jewish people by God, through Moses.

Yet, in his vision, God appears to Peter, presents to him a bounty of foods that are unclean, and tells him to eat up.

Peter, perhaps thinking this was a test, says: “No way! I never eat anything that is profane or unclean!”

And then we come to understand that God is talking about more than just food. God is talking about people. People like Cornelius. 

Cornelius was not a Jew. Cornelius was not a follower of Jesus. Cornelius was a soldier in the Roman army. For many reasons, he was a person to be avoided, just as anything profane or unclean was to be avoided.

But how is it that we decide who is unclean, and who is clean? Cornelius, as a soldier in the Roman army, was the oppressor. So that kind of makes sense. The Romans were against the followers of Jesus, so it made sense that the followers of Jesus would be against them.

But it didn’t make sense to God.

God told Peter: “Go to Cornelius.” So Peter did. 

And throughout all this, Peter learned that the boundaries we make as humans, between who’s in and who’s out… between those who are good and those who are bad… between people who are clean and who are unclean… 

God is always trying to erase those boundaries. God is always working to overcome the divides we’ve set up between groups of people. 

Neither Gentile nor Jew, slave or free, woman or man. In the kingdom of God, we are all one. 

Even soldiers in the Roman army, if you can believe that.

I imagine that Peter’s first response to this was: What is God thinking?

Because it contradicted one of Peter’s deeply held beliefs. It contradicted what Peter thought he knew about God. After all, the laws about keeping things clean and unclean came from God. Didn’t they?

 What was God thinking?

Yet, whatever God was thinking, God seems to have been thinking it a lot. Even though the laws about clean and unclean came from God through Moses, it also seems that God has been working—throughout history—to overturn those laws… or, at least, overturn the way they’ve been interpreted.

Because even in the Old Testament, God can be seen doing what we see him doing today: taking the enemy, the person placed on the other side of the line that separates the good from the bad, and bringing them over to the good side… effectively erasing that dividing line altogether.

God called Moses, an adopted member of Pharaoh’s household, to be the one who rescues God’s people from Pharaoh’s oppression.

God chose Ruth the Moabite to fill an essential position on the family tree of King David, the family tree of Jesus himself, even though Moabites like her were considered evil.

God recognized the goodness of Job, even though Job was from Uz, a place where, it was thought, no good people lived.

God even chose to have his son be from Nazareth, a place where even some of Jesus’ own disciples thought nothing good could come from.

But Cornelius really takes the cake when it comes to all this. Everything the apostles believed told them that a line must be drawn, and a Roman soldier like Cornelius must certainly be on the other side of that line. 

Yet God sent Peter across that line, to welcome Cornelius in.


Because of this, I think of what happened to my friend Tanya in her church parking lot. I think of the man who was taken away by ICE agents. I think of all those who have been deemed “illegal,” those who our government has decided don’t belong here, aren’t welcome here… they are unclean in the eyes of many… but are they unclean in the eyes of God?

And I think of the ICE agents themselves. The terror they are inflicting on individuals and on communities… it really isn’t all that different from the terror that Roman soldiers inflicted in the first century. 

Cornelius, a Roman soldier, a centurion in the Roman army, is an ICE agent. He’s a leader of ICE agents.

So whether you believe that undocumented people like the man in the church parking lot don’t belong here, or whether you believe that the ICE agents are the ones who don’t belong and who shouldn’t be welcomed…

What does God think?

And how do we follow Jesus’ lead in proclaiming release to the captives and freedom to the oppressed? How do we follow Jesus’ lead in welcoming the stranger AND loving our enemies? 

This is hard stuff.

It makes us wonder: What is God thinking?

Part of the challenge, I think, is that we have in our minds that there are only two options: whether we’re talking about Roman centurions or undocumented neighbors or ICE agents, we see only two options. Either they are good, or they’re bad.

Either they are for us (and we should be for them), or they are against us (and we should be against them).

We kind of classify everyone that way, don’t we? We’ve become so divided in this country… that we see everyone as either on the right side (meaning, the same side we’re on), or on the wrong side, the side our enemies are on.

But time and time again, we see God do away with sides completely. God doesn’t choose either of the two options that we think are our only options. God chooses—or creates—a third option: doing away with the sides completely. 

And bringing all people together, in one humanity, rooted in love. Bringing all people together in one humanity, rooted in love.

It’s as simple as that.

And, it’s as incredibly challenging as that.


Sunday, April 8, 2012

Easter: Forwards and Backwards (Acts 10:34-43, John 20:1-18)

Throughout Lent, the season leading up to Easter, I have focused my sermons on progressive Christianity. There are many Christian beliefs that people assume they must accept, or else they’re not really Christian. But many of these beliefs, they simply find unbelievable. They’re contrary to reason, they’re contrary to science, and – ironically – they are contrary to the Christian virtue of compassion.

Which leaves people a choice: either deny what they know to be true in order to accept the claims of Christianity; or, leave the church and abandon the faith.

Progressive Christianity liberates us from this dead-end. Progressive Christianity says it’s okay to ask questions; in fact, questions are encouraged. It’s okay to have doubts. It’s okay to engage in a debate with scripture itself.

In Jesus’ time, this would have been expected. And it’s still expected in Jewish congregations today. A few weeks ago, I attended a Jewish Shabbat service, as a part of Chapman University’s Founders’ Day. For this occasion, there were many Christians present, and at one point during the sermon, a few of them shouted out an “Amen!”

The preacher laughed; she said that among Jews, the typical response is not “Amen;” the typical response is, “Are you sure? Because that’s not how I see it…” Among Jews, both today, and 2,000 years ago, faith is made stronger through questioning, conversing, and debating.
So please keep that in mind today as we examine the resurrection. Feel free to question what I’m about to say, to disagree, to say, “that’s not how I see it.” Because in this Christian congregation, that’s okay.

Not long ago, archaeologists discovered a container – called an ossuary – that held some ancient bones. The ossuary was inscribed, “James, the son of Joseph, the brother of Jesus.”

There is some debate about the authenticity of the inscription, and scientists can’t tell if the inscription on the ossuary is as old as the ossuary itself.

However, all this has led progressive theologian and Bible scholar Marcus Borg to ask: What if archaeologists one day discover the bones of Jesus?

It is very much a hypothetical question. In fact, Borg himself doesn’t think it will ever happen. But if the bones of Jesus were found in a tomb, proving that a physical resurrection never happened, would that prove that Easter – which is all about an empty tomb – is a lie? Would that discovery invalidate Christianity as a whole?

Oh, I wish I had more time to talk about this today. We’re just barely going to scratch the surface! But maybe, in the weeks and months to come, we can ask questions, debate, and discuss, … and how exciting it will be!

It’s an interesting question, though, isn’t it? What if the bones of Jesus were discovered? Could faith survive that? Is there a truth in the resurrection story that is deeper and stronger than even a story of the body of one man coming back to life?

In past weeks, I’ve talked about the deeper truth and meaning behind many of our Bible stories; that much of what we read can be heard the same way we hear the parables: as stories that may or may not be literally true, but which have a deeper meaning.

Many progressive Christians read the Creation story this way, and also stories like Noah and the Ark, and Jonah (who was swallowed by a giant fish). Many Christians see a deep and abiding truth in these stories, a moral that doesn’t depend on a literal reading.

Many of these same Christians, however, cannot read the resurrection story this same way. They believe that it literally happened, or that they think that they are supposed to believe this. Only a few – some archaeologists, Bible scholars, and members of a group called the Jesus Seminar, mostly – dare to suggest that the resurrection itself might be a metaphor, a parable, for the awakening, the realization, and the new understanding that came to the disciples after Jesus’ death; a new understanding that brought new life and purpose to the work Jesus called them to.

What do I think? I think we should keep asking questions!

And the first and most important question I think we should ask is: So what? What difference does it all make? What does it mean to say, "I believe in the resurrection?"

For me, the resurrection means that there is hope and new life. Always.
It means that if things are at their bleakest, that is not the final word. There will be a tomorrow. Evil will be overcome. Not even death will put an end to hope.

How often do we find, in the midst of great sorrow and suffering, signs of hope and new life? We saw it after 9/11, when even the drivers on the streets of New York started responding to one another with just a little more kindness and compassion.

We saw it after Hurricane Katrina, after the earthquake in Haiti, after the tornadoes in Joplin, Missouri: an outpouring of support and relief; strangers helping strangers, recognizing – perhaps for the first time – that we are not individuals, but that we are bound together as one by something much greater than ourselves.

We see it in our own lives and the lives of those around us: in the midst of despair, sorrow, and sadness, and even in the midst of tragedy, we discover that life and love and hope are stronger, and outlast all other things.
God does not cause suffering. God does not cause sorrow. But in the midst of tragedy and even death, God is always at work, bringing forth new life.

When I start with what the archaeologists and the scholars know about what happened and what might have happened 2,000 years ago, and then move forward to today,… yes, I have questions (and they are fascinating questions!) .

But when I go the other way, when I move backwards, it makes a world of difference. When I see all the ways that hope and new life persevere, all the ways that new life is revealed even when all hope is lost, all the times that life triumphs over death…

then I know…

that the resurrection is true.