It
didn’t take long for those authorities to find him, arrest him, and execute
him. At the time of his death, scholars think he was about 33 years of
age.
I
mentioned that Jesus was 33 when he was executed; in that time, the average
life expectancy for someone who survived infancy and childhood was around 40
years of age. Some people, blessed with
remarkably good health, did live to be 70 or 80, while others, afflicted with
diseases or conditions that could easily be treated today, died much, much
younger.
Given
that so many people died young, and given that crucifixion was not unique to
Jesus, what was it that made his death so significant and meaningful?
The
life expectancies for these churches vary greatly. Some of these churches have been around for
centuries. Many others are born, survive
for only a few years, then close their doors.
Churches die all the time.
When
Jesus died, it was seen by his closest followers as a failure of their movement
and all it stood for. Their leader was
dead, and it seemed the movement he started was dead with him.
They
were devastated.
But
– spoiler alert! – three days later their eyes were opened and they realized
that it wasn’t a failure. They realized
that Jesus’s death was, in fact, necessary, that it die have meaning.
And
a generation or two later, when the gospels were written, they were cleverly
crafted in such a way that everything in them led up to that climactic end,
when Jesus died on the cross.
The
details about what, exactly, it all means, differ between the four
gospels.
Of
the four gospels, three of them have Jesus rising from the dead after three
days.
Of
those three, there are different explanations of what the resurrected Jesus was
like. In one account, he has a body that
can be touched by his followers. In
another, his resurrection body is not something that can be touched.
But
in all four gospels, Jesus dies on a cross, and his death is not portrayed as a
failure. His death is not the end. Rather, it is just the beginning.
When
a church dies, we have a harder time seeing things that same way. The gospels portray a Jesus who walked confidently toward his death, knowing
that it would fulfill his purpose.
Churches that are near-death, however, do just the opposite. They dig their claws in to the ground, trying
desperately to hold on to what little life they have left…
This
clinging to life can last for decades.
Jesus said repeatedly, “the Son of Man must die,” but churches that are
barely clinging to life insist, “We will not die!”
Jesus
risked everything to fulfill his purpose and his mission… Churches that are near-death are willing to
risk nothing, for fear that the slightest thing might put that final nail into
the coffin.
This,
I think, is the one aspect of Christ’s crucifixion that we don’t like to think
about. It’s one thing that Christ had to
die; it’s a whole other thing to think that we might be called to die with him.
The nice thing about substitutionary
atonement is that we get off scott-free; no punishment for us! But the downside is that God is portrayed as
mean and abusive. After all, what loving
father would require the death of his own son in order to calm his own anger?
Paul
writes to the Romans that “all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus
were baptized into his death.” Participatory atonement. And to the Galatians, Paul wrote: “I have
been crucified with Christ.”
For
Paul, there is no digging one’s claws into the ground, desperately trying to
avoid death. Paul, like Christ, embraces
death.
In
a book called Losing Your Faith, Finding
Your Soul, David Robert Anderson mentions novelist Reynolds Price, who
discovered how embracing death can be a good thing. It happened because Reynolds Price went through
a horrific ordeal with spinal cancer.
David
Robert Anderson then acknowledges that “Pronouncing yourself dead happens to be
the prerequisite of all faith traditions. (St. Paul says flatly, ‘I die daily,’
and Zen master Maezumi Roshi suggests, ‘Why don’t you die now, and enjoy the
rest of your life?’)…”
Imagine
its death. Imagine that it’s 3 or 5
years in the future, and that project, that organization, that church, has
died. And ask yourself: What killed it?
Now
if we were to apply this exercise to our congregation… Don’t get me wrong, I am
hopeful about our congregation, but as an exercise… imagine that it’s 3 or 4 or
5 years in the future, and we’ve reached the final worship service for Bixby
Knolls Christian Church. The church is
closing its doors. And then ask: Why?
What killed the church?
Think
of all the reasons you can that might have caused the death of the church.
I
can think of two possible reasons...
Reason
#1 is that the church did too little.
The church dug its claws in the ground, its members huddled in around
themselves, and refused to embark on anything new or risky… The church stopped
giving to mission and outreach, preferring to save the money for its own
survival… and the church just slowly fizzled out until there was nothing left.
Reason
#2 is very different. Reason #2 is that
the church died because it did too much.
The church overextended. It
reached out in mission. It sought ways
to be bold in ministry, and it cost the church dearly.
The
church loved too much. It cared too
much. It gave too much... It gave
until nothing was left.
Now,
if the church is going to die anyway, which do you think is the better way to
die?
But
after 2000 years, does it really matter whether one man in the first century
lived to 33 or to 40?
What
does make a difference is the reason he died. Jesus died bringing life to others. He died – he was killed – because his love
was too great. The authorities didn’t
want to love people, they wanted to control people. Jesus was a challenge to that.
And
no amount of threats – not even knowledge of his own impending death – could
keep Jesus from parading into Jerusalem and challenging the system that would
deny life and love to the people.
Now
that is a good death. From that death
comes life.
From that death comes
life.
The
years Reynolds Price spent with spinal cancer were, as I said, a horrific
ordeal. For the past few decades, the
church has endured its own horrific ordeal.
Since the 1960s, the church has been struggling.
And,
for the most part, the church has endured that ordeal by struggling to get its
old life back. It has dug its claws
in.
Perhaps
it would be helpful for someone to say to the church: “The church you know is dead. What will the church be now?
Those
words are true today, perhaps even more so than they were then. The church needs to die. It needs to die so that others can have
life. It needs to die so that it may be
reborn into something new.
No comments:
Post a Comment